Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 114 and 34 of the AMD, conviction of the convict AMD, attempt, joint intention guarantee, guarantee of co-accused, whose bail was granted, only to be charged There was nothing in the record to support him, but there was nothing in the record to suggest that the accused had ever misused the bail exception, or with evidence during the investigation. The tampering was According to the law, the illegal order was strictly approved. And the jurisdiction exercised by the lower court was within its competence. The order to grant bail was neither obverse, arbitrary or unreasonable, and was granted for good reason, in the case of cancellation of bail. The requirements for approval were radically different. By a competent court, then exceptional circumstances required interfering with the said order, the request for a cancellation of bail, without force, was dismissed. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
