A. VIII, R11 and Section 11 Partition Act (I98 of 1893), division 4 to re-occupy the suit, rejection of the application of the rule, application of the principle to be considered by the court. The defendants moved the request for rejection. Oli (VI), R 11, CPC legal proceedings for the same reason that the material intrusion was granted to stop the litigation, O VII, R 11, no evidence to seek CPC Could be seen because the conclusion had to be made. In the present case, the proceedings of the plaintiff had no involvement in the contentious account and the previous case of permanent injunction filed by the plaintiffs was dropped and the order was finalized as against the present case. No appeal was filed. Due to the same proceedings filed for division through possession, the present defendants had no opportunity to succeed in the case because the case already existed. They were already tried and decided against the courts below. The results entered were based on the review in which the revision was rejected in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
