Section 13 students received notice of the desired plaintiff's performance stating that the seller intended to sell the suit property but refused to buy at the stated rate in which the plaintiff was already aware of the sale of the suit land and She was not his co-owner. The plaintiff wrote on the notice of the plaintiff and the plaintiff on behalf of the plaintiff, and the letter was also sent to the defendants. The lawyer was not present at the time and did not know anything about the first casualty. The second divorce can be confirmed by the plaintiff or by someone who is present at the time of the student's performance. The second strategy was not, in the circumstances, not performed correctly and was not capable of being interpreted. According to the contradictions of the law, the performance of the witness would be equivalent to disqualification in view of the truth of the testimony of the witness, as the two courts below correctly evaluated the evidence on record. Was not involved in misreading the verdict or the review of the evidence was omitted due to lack of evidence
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014