Claims to be the property of a former owner's widow on a proof-of-proof document proof house, thirty years old, for declaring the Arts 72 and 100 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), section 17 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 42 suit. Was executed on the basis of the Dover process, and the widow was the plaintiff's grandmother who claims to be the defendant on the basis of the registered gift proceedings executed by her grandmother. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim, but the lower appellate court reversed the findings and dismissed the case in favor of the plaintiff. Delivery David Dade was more than 30 years old, but such a fact alone was not enough to justify the document under Article 100. The age of only one document, the 1984 Convention of Martyrs, does not constitute evidence of the accuracy of the contents of such a document nor will it deal with it. Regular evidence If the authenticity of a document was in doubt, the court may refuse to extend the speculation and ask for evidence that the lower appellate court's finding in this regard would be a proper assessment of the law on the subject. Was not based on Accuracy was attached to the registered document but while its implementation was in progress, the beneficiary of such a registered process was obliged not only to prove its execution but also to the plaintiff's question on the question of presentation. The contents of the evidence were also lacking, the acceptance and delivery of the possession under the gift irrespective of the fact that the plaintiff had been in the possession of the suithouse since its birth, the trial court had held the defendant's trial. Defendant Ali rejected
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
