Section 144 of the Law on Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 36 of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), the maintenance of possession of immovable property in section 8, and the restoration of the interior scope of Mason's profit during the proceedings of this party's prior injunction, A statement made before the trial court in respect of the defendant admitting the possession and payment of the dues amounted to such statement to the defendant's admission and approved decree as the defendant's confession. The plaintiffs' conviction was that the judgment and order passed by the trial court were implemented. There was no definitive evidence of legal admission as a legal admission, and an admission that was wrong on the facts point of view and unaware of legal rights did not have any binding effect on the person, which ultimately led to Admission was no exception to such admission. The obligation to form a party was when, as a result of such an admission, the other party changed its position and the plaintiffs' misconception of acting as an argument against the party was misunderstood because such a situation Was covered by Article 144, CPC, pursuant to which, when the trial court / appellate court's order was dismissed by the superior forum, the party against which this order was brought into force may be. The original status should be restored / restored before the approval of the decree, so the plaintiffs' reasoning was not practicable. After the High Court recorded the full evidence of the judgment and order passed by the trial court, the matter was further settled on merit. Appeal on remand for judgment was allowed. Conditions
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
