Section 13 Talisman Moti Abad Notification Seller was not presented as a witness for sale in the case relating to the eviction, date and place of eviction, but the case filed by the litigant was not formally filed. The trial court and the lower appellate court ruled. The truth sought in his favor was that as soon as the offer came to be known as a sale transaction, the fact that the victim was a fact of fact, he had to prove in court before the date, It was necessary to mention the time, and the place in the case, which he did likewise, should be mentioned in his own evidence as well. During the course of the trial, the recitation should be taken seriously according to the law and it should be taken only Should not be considered technologically because the victim failed to produce evidence, namely the informant who allegedly told him about the most controversial transaction. He was notified that he did not give a reason why he was unable to produce a witness who had previously notified M for sale that the informant was fatal to the prosecution's suit in both the lower courts. And the lower appellate court committed material misconduct by misrepresentation and non-reading of the record, therefore, their decision was put aside and the trial judge dismissed because he failed to prove it. It was allowed to modify the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
