Section 1 561A Panel Code (XLV of 60 of 60), Section 9489F for issuing a check petition for canceling the FIR contract / sale process by the complainant in favor of the complainant's husband. The petitioner's husband was brought into action in connection with the vehicle sold. The applicant vehicle was handed over to the applicant's husband, who issued two checks in response, which were allegedly dishonored in which the complainant and the applicant in any capacity at any stage Was not directly involved in each other's transactions, did not know anywhere. The other was known, and he belonged to different areas and had no interest in any way. The complainant had not found any locus standi to file a case against the applicant, as he did not The applicant had not provided the vehicle nor had he made a partial payment. If the complainant presents a case, the same will be against the applicant's husband which is not necessary for the applicant. Section 489F under the CEP, PPC was missing because the applicant never issued a check in favor of the complaining parties for the alleged contract. After being involved in litigation before a civil court, its fate will be determined only by the competent court. The whole transaction accepts no liability against the applicant, no criminal liability against the applicant / The case did not come up, the FIR was filed against it under Section 489F. The PPC, in the circumstances, was terminated
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
