Sections 5 365 and 5 365 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 164 Qun Qhad QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ Q Qan Qan Q () (an () ( (((() (() () ((((( There was no record of any confession of guilt or conspiracy or intent to abduct a person. There was no record of ransom demand by the accused or on behalf of the prosecution witnesses. Confessed that the kidnapping took place while the accused was driving, the statement of the accused under section 164 The CCP was, in fact, admitting the facts that the accused witnessed the abduction in the same transaction and allowed the abductor to be parked in the vehicle while the accused was driving the vehicle mentioned by the accused regarding such admission of facts. There were facts which would prove to be an offense for abduction under Section 365, the CRCC, the accused under Section 164 of the PPC statement, withdrew from it. Confession Confession should be voluntary, necessary and truthful defense and fails to identify any significant evidence to harm or diminish the effect of the retreat, voluntarily and in relation to which such statement is authorized. The defendants listed under Section 164, CCPC, were also corroborated by other direct or circumstantial evidence relating to material details and at the same time could be relied upon at the time and place of arrest of the vehicle and the accused, who were identified as the offender. Was done by the eyewitness and recorded in it. Mursila will lead to a negative view against the accused when Wa
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
