A. VIII, R11, Sections 9 and 115 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 53 and 172 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 42 announcing the revocation of the scoping retention scandal. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit in which the defendant submitted a request for the plaintiff's rejection, which was jointly rejected. The defendant's claim was that the matter was already related to the rectification of the plaintiff's deficit and that a decision had already been made on the issue regarding the legal status of the defendants. Not satisfied with the orders for the reinforcement of revenue, he established a civil suit under section 53 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, the suit was between the parties to the property dispute when the Revenue Authority filed the suit with the civil court. Directed to seek treatment. The question of ownership by the respondent in connection with the correction of disputed e was frivolous in the jurisdiction under section 172 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, such a complex and internal question concerning such entries. Would interfere with the rights of an individual, which could be provoked before the civil court under Western Section 53. The issue of dispute between the Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 parties was not an easy matter of resolving the entries in the present case, but also about the claim of ownership of the disputed property which falls under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Civil Court. Section 9, CPC's current revision against the defamation order was not enforceable because similar treatment had already been taken by the lower appellate court; any illegal or irregularities in the unwarranted decision.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
