Find a Lawyer

SARDAR ALI versus MST. YASMIN

Section 6 pre-discrimination right was that the plaintiff was a co-owner of the property and he was entitled to pre-emption suit. The suit was dismissed concurrently after the division of the same pre-emptor. The partner was not a partner. Failure to prove their right to dispute in disputed property The following courts, after scrutinizing the evidence available on record, recorded the coordination of law and fact finding and were neither misled nor in any discretion. Legal, irregular, or jurisdictional defects were not identified. False decisions and orders passed by the following courts were indicated by the plaintiff not to read any false statements or evidence denied interference in the circumstances

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• WAHAB GUL v. SIKANDAR ALI 2014 YLR 2130
• NOOR MUHEET v. ATTAULLAH 2014 YLR 2141
• Pir SUMMAR SHAH v. I.G.P. 2014 YLR 2156
• MASOOD ANWAR v. State 2014 YLR 2164
• QABIL BAD SHAH v. HAZRAT BILAL 2014 YLR 2191
• MUHAMMAD HANIF KHAN v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PAKISTAN 2014 YLR 2203
• WALI RAZA v. SAIFULLAH KHAN 2014 YLR 2212
• DARWESH v. State 2014 YLR 2223

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

registration advocate from Tando Adam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes