HABIB BANK LIMITED versus R.G. MATCH INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD.
The client / defendant's case reading for leave to defend the banking court procedure for Sections 10 (4), 10 (6) and 9 Recovery was that the statement of accounts did not have the correct picture. Shown. Matters and its use of markup were not in accordance with the finance agreement. Implementation of the financial case agreement was not specifically denied by the defendants and the defendants who have to file and defend the case must disclose the defense or show that the facts and the law There were important questions related to Need to sue, otherwise, the defense was denied leave and the trial could not be granted on a mere denial or, as usual, a defense leave, all documents associated with a lawsuit As part of the reading and the contents and parcels of the contents cannot be read in isolation, all terms and conditions of the finance agreement between the parties, and the approval letter should read in conjunction with the paragraph of the plaint and it cannot be argued. That the financial institution has made an account under section 10 (6) of the Financial Institution (Financial Recovery) Ordinance 2001 Invalid entry in TK statement provided. As a result of non-compliance with the provisions of section 10 (4) of the Ordinance, in the present case the defendants will reject the leave application for defense, they failed to specify the amount payable to the bank and their Failed to show the disputed amount in the request of. Request for leave for defense Application for leave was dismissed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
