Sections 14 and 5 of the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance (III of 1962), Section 18 The effect of filing an appeal in the wrong forum without the jurisdiction to exclude the time of proceedings in the court only after the jurisdiction appeals the forum. The wind time cannot be excluded because the appeal cannot be included in this case or the application of section 14 of the Limitation Act 1908 may be taken advantage of for the purpose of excluding the time used in the appeal case against the wrong forum. For this purpose, before filing an action the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1908 can be summoned only by showing sufficient. The reason for filing an appeal which was time constrained is that there is no publicity and good faith in Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, in which the views given in both sections cannot be equated with delay and The power to waive approval was an arbitrary extension of time under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, which is permissible in section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, so there was sufficient reason for it to be applicable so the party's counsel during the proceedings and The conduct of the conduct was sufficiently objective to determine the amount of Rs. 12,00,000 present for the case and the appeal lies before the High Court. Will speak if the appellant has proved that he has filed. Appeal to a wrong forum, despite the attention and care, the appeal of the wrong forum was, in the circumstances, beyond its control, presenting an appeal in the district court was a gross negligence on which to appeal the district judge. Was given 16 5 2012 and it was returned on 2 10 2012 but after a delay of seven days it was preferred before the High Court.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
