Sections 302 (b), 324, 337f (II), 34, 148 and 149 murder witnesses, witnesses injured on the occasion of attempt to commit murder, Ummah, ah, common intention, riot His presence, though not doubtful, but his presence was not proof that he had deposed the facts, the credibility of the main star witness of the prosecution was highly skeptical, which led to the conclusion. That the incident did not take place in this incident. According to the mood and manner as alleged by the complainant in the FIR. And he stated in his judicial statements, which created a serious suspicion in the prosecution's case, which should have given the defendant's request for defense, in the present case, it was more likely and convincing that all the injured and killed. The victim was targeted. Kalashnikov and he accidentally / suddenly went away and got away with the plaque in favor of defense. The recovery of bullets and blood-stained witnesses from the scene indicated that the crime had taken place, but the manner and style of the mystery had been cast into question. The medical officer was contrary to the testimony of these two witnesses, that a fugitive could constitute contentious evidence against a person accused of a crime, but when there was no direct evidence against an accused, or the evidence presented was reliable, Or was it not trustworthy to convict someone in capital accusation; then fugitives, even if for a long period, would not have the benefit of a prosecution case, because people falsely accused them of being falsely accused. Or otherwise delay the filing of this report by 24 hours
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
