Section 1 561 of the Illegal Disposition Act (of XI of 2005), section,,,, and the right of complainants to seize 7 illegal property, even if one has to look after the recording of the evidence. And that too, after the civil suit filed by them was finalized, the civil suit for possession by division was filed a lot after the complaint was filed under the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005, at the time of filing the complaint. No ownership was controlled by. On the date of the enforcement of the Illegal Settlement Act 2005, no possession was already pending before any forum, it would fall under the purview of the Act, Section 3 of the Unlawful Dispossession Act 2005 According to the provisions, it cannot be recovered. For the purpose of attracting the provisions of section 3, the court was required to examine whether the occupier of such property was in his or her legitimate possession. And the accused entered the property illegally. And the expulsion of the occupier, even the co-owner, could not be distributed to any other partner, without any distribution law or impeded order by law, which was rightly approved, Was retained and the petition was dismissed under section 6161A, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
