Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM

Section 13 (4) application for restoration of tenants' possession was ordered on the basis of the tenant's default deduction when they offered rent payments and premises required by the landlord for their personal use. Were. The tenant believed that the landlord had failed to occupy the shop The question and request for restoration of possession by the controller of the tenant to start the business was rejected in order to prove the tenant Llanlord's dispute. There was no evidence on record that he was running his business in the disputed shop, the tenant failed to say anything illegal or material irregularities or weakness of the facts in the illegal order.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014

• Ms. ZAHIDA NAWAZ v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Agriculture and Cooperative Department 2014 PLC(CS) 294
• HABIBULLAH v. Mir MANZOOR HUSSAIN 2014 MLD 303
• JALAL UD DIN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 308
• PAKISTAN WORKERS FEDERATION, BALOCHISTAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Federal Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad 2014 PLC 351
• PAKISTAN PETROLEUM LIMITED v. CHIEF MINISTER, BALOCHISTAN through Principal Secretary Chief Minister House, Quetta 2014 CLC 405
• GHULAM DASTAGEER v. State 2014 PCrLJ 410
• MRDUMAN-E-MALLE ZAI NIDA KAHOL through Haji Saleh Muhammad v. MARDUMAN-E-KILLI KHUDAI-E-RAHIM SADEZAI (SHAI) 2014 CLC 426
• The STATE through Prosecutor-General Balochistan, Quetta v. ABDUL ALEEM 2014 PCrLJ 432

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2014 →

how to become a advocate from Sialkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes