DR. ABDUL RASHEED versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Arts 8, 22 (3), 25 (1), 37 (c) and the 1991 Constitution Application for Allotment Merit Applicants of Academic Institutions seats Technical, Vocational and Higher Education Accessible Letters Section OI (I 1) 1/15 26/2011/4219 26, Dated 25 2 12, issued by the Government of Balochistan, under which the method of dividing seats for minor diplomas and major diplomas was fixed at the Postgraduate Medical Institute in Quetta. Art 22 was violated at the Institute for Validity Reserving Seats for applicants belonging to specific divisions. (B), Articles 25 (c) and (37 (c)) of the Articles of8 of the Constitution stipulate that the State shall not make any law that strikes or abolishes 41?, that is, The law made in violation of the rights (fundamental rights) and any clause (8 (2)) was invalid to the extent of such infringement; the letter caught by the applicants did not even have a law, the constitution Pakistan was also violated and for that reason, the Constitution's request was exceeded as the High Court and the High Court when exercising jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution gave the government respondents Vieta may refrain from entering the Institute on the basis of a letter allocating seats for various divisions of the city, which was neither a charter of the Institute, Pakistan, but with the permission of the Medical and Dental Council Regulations or the Constitution, the High Court declared. Is that the questions about admission based on the divisional quota listed in it and the charter of the institute were illegal, illegal and ultra-virus based, the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Regulations and hence the Constitution.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
