Section 9 (b) (c) defines drug possession and trafficking evidence, recovered marijuana, allegedly weighs two kilograms in the form of four pieces, five grams was separated from these fragments and a parcel. The piece I was sealing should have been removed, and it should have been sealed in a separate parcel for chemical testing if no samples were taken from a particular fragment, or if different samples taken from different fragments were obtained from the Chemical Examiner. If the pass was not sent individually for analysis, this would not be the case. A "representative sample"; and it would be unsafe to rely solely on the words of the prosecution's witnesses regarding these substances, which were not taken separately and sealed separately or tested for the drug. , For this chemical test, five grams of the sample will be considered extracted as a fragment, which was considered 1 // 2 kg, and only 1 // 2 kg as the recovered drug against the accused. As was understood, the defendant could not be convicted under the remaining 2/2 kilograms of marijuana. Under section 9 (c) of the Trial Court of Narcotic Substances Act 1997, the offense was changed to section 9 (b) of the Act. And the conviction was reduced to four years \ RI was limited to one year and six months \ RI; and a fine of Rs 20,000 was reduced to Rs 13,000 \ r \ n
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
