Appointment of Chairman, Federal Service Tribunal effect constitutional application under the jurisdiction of Arts 212 (2), 199, 4 and 10A Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), section 212 (2) of the Constitution Article 212 (2) of the Constitution related to the absence of appointment of Chairman Maintenance Bar was filed before the High Court when the service case was filed with the High Court when the Administrative Court or Tribunal under Section 3 Could have been in operation at that time. (1) The Service Tribunals Act, 1973 was interpreted by the Administrative Court or the Tribunal's word \ Establishment of the Constitution, cannot be limited to the completion of papers by any appropriate legislation, unless it is established in any way. To be done It was in accordance with the law and adhered to the jurisdiction, the physical existence and the inability of the administrative court or tribunal to attract the work of the jurisdiction under Article 212 (2) of the Constitution before any such administrative court or tribunal. After being treated, the dismissal of such a court or tribunal high court cannot be vacated indefinitely. In such cases the constitutional petition on the basis of jurisdiction under Article 212 (2) of the Constitution would be a violation of the principle of 'UB Just Ibid treatment' (wherever a right exists) and the spirit of Arts 4 &. Article 10A of the Constitution should be entertained and proceeded before the High Court in accordance with law, unless the establishment and operation of the Federal Service Tribunal, Article 212 (2) of the Constitution prohibits such proceedings. Will not apply to Accordingly, the Federal Government has been directed to be the Chairman, Federal under Section 3 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973.
