KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD ASIF versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution relating to the award of a project of Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (SSGCL), a state-owned enterprises, to Jamshoro Joint Ventures Limited (JJL) for liquid petroleum gas mining. Constitutional application. LPG) Agreement to be entered into between SSGCL and JJVL in the process of illicit and illegal supportive corruption and corruption provided by SSGCL to JJVL. I had material changes implemented. The rights and duties of the SSGCL and the successful bidder, and if material changes to the implementation agreement were made after the bid, would be contrary to the concept of a fair and open competitive bidding implementation agreement. SSGCL had acted in favor of JJVL. The implementation of the contract changes in D was substantially and materially different from the draft draft fleet enforcement agreements, material in nature, and such changes made to benefit JVL. Never available to the parties, the definition of in-gas sales contract def provided in the form of an execution agreement was changed to the final implementation agreement under the SSGCL. And the JJL record shows that JJL considered such changes in its implementation agreement to be material and favorable, and to this day, JJL was receiving illegal benefits that were not available to him. Rather it was for the unnecessary and unlawful increase in the correspondence of the execution agreement. Between JJVL and SSGCL was clearly seen
