Article 188 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 426, which included in the Supreme Court decision seeking review of removal of negative comments against a High Court judge, removal of irregularities, external affairs and arbitration by judge Includes exercise. Scope trial court's second / subsequent appeal for sentencing, Scope trial court sentenced the accused to life imprisonment The accused filed his first appeal before the High Court for suspension but dismissed charges of non-prosecution. I was dismissed, the accused filed his second petition for suspension, before the High Court petitioner's judge, who was rejected after some lengthy arguments when the accused was withdrawn on the same grounds as the previous two petitions. The same petitioner, who had filed his third application for suspension of sentence, did not, but did not It was filed by the original lawyer who filed and represented the accused in the crime. There were the first two petitions but filed by a different lawyer and this time the attempt was successful and the applicant judge, The suspect's other plea for relief was dismissed, the suspect's sentence suspended and he was released on bail. Approved by the applicant judge and also seeing that the applicant had arbitrarily appealed, but passing the order appears somewhat commendable as on the basis of which the second application for suspension of sentence is dismissed. After making the difference, the third application for the same relief was a different lawyer for the accused, the applicant judge sentenced
