CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST IMRAN KHAN, CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TEHREEK-I-INSAF versus
Arts 204, 19 and 66 contempt of court Ordinance (IV of 2003), Section 3 derogatory remarks about the judiciary, contempt of court against the privilege of members of the parliament for freedom of expression, hatred of judges, slander. Action started. And for contempt of using the word "shameful" to explain the judiciary. The first, alleged contender, to mock and abuse the judiciary was the result of a misunderstanding of the wrong word attributed to it. And that his complaint relates to the administrative conduct of the nominating returning officers of the subordinate judiciary responsible for holding free and fair elections in the country, that word () was used by the alleged claimant, In different meanings. And the context, which is regarded as a derogatory and derogatory remarks for the judiciary, is allegedly related to the stance that its complaint relates to misconduct in the general election and the required remarks to the judicial officers' poor management performance. Were in view. Was tasked with conducting / monitoring elections. When the contemptuous action by him was in the nature of a criminal action, the benefit of any suspicion allegedly in favor of the offenders was to be extended, and the alleged contempt during that proceeding makes it clear that He expressed his full respect and respect for the alleged claimant of the court, and was a formally elected member of the National Assembly, who had been active in politics for a long time and had been chairman of a political party, and in such cases, Judging by their conduct, try the court
