Sections 345 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 (b), 324, 353, 148, 149 and 337f (iii) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 (m) and (n), 7 (A)), (c) and (h) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 188 Review of the judgment of the murder of a policeman of the Supreme Court while on the Duty Act of Terrorism found guilty under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 Impact of allegedly shooting and killing a police officer during a compromised police raid between outgoing criminals and legal heirs: Anti-Terrorist Court sentenced the accused to death on two counts, once Section 302 (b), pp. Under c And the accused was sentenced to death under Section 7 of the Anti Terrorism Act 1997. Before the Supreme Court dismissed, the High Court's request for leave to appeal by the accused was affirmed, against which the defendants filed a review request during the review petition, the accused with the legal heirs of the deceased policeman. Compromised and appealed to the Supreme Court. He said that he should be acquitted of the merits of the present case relating to the offense under section 2302 (b), PPC, as the statements and inquiries of the compromising witnesses (police officers). He died as a result of recoveries made during. The policeman was killed while on public duty, and such disclosures were sustained by the High Court and the Supreme Court offense under Section 353, which proved against the PPC accused when he sent a police officer. Shot dead, performing his official duties, therefore, under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997
