15, 16, 17 and 18 constitution of Pakistan, Arts 9, 25 and 184 (3) under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, the constitutional petition challenges the policy decision of the Board of Management of Habib Bank Limited (Bank). By which the bank's 308 employees were retired early and the services of 2 employees were terminated by payment of three months' due diligence (questioners). He was essentially retired because of his needs but the changing needs of the bank were neither stated nor shown, so the action against them was arbitrary, serious, serious and unfair. That some of the employees of the bank who were hired as the same employees (applicants) were retained, The employees had no fundamental right in question was discriminatory treatment of plyh bank, which is in violation of this means that the bank is called. And that the employees were merely (private) contracting employees of the bank, whose services were strictly distributed according to the terms of the contract (ie, in accordance with Habib Bank Limited Staff Service Rules, 1981 Rr 15 and 17). A)) Under Habib Bank Limited Staff Service Rules 1981, the bank had full authority to terminate its employees / terminate through early retirement, as well as this employee had the option to quit. RB 16 and 18 of the aforesaid rules when R 17 (a) of Habib Bank Limited Staff Service Rules 1981 was widely sought for bank employees under the Board of Management's decision. Understand that decision and this process
