SYED TAHIR HUSSAIN MEHMOODI versus AGHA SYED LIAQAT ALI
O XVII, R 3 Failure of Defendant's Evidence to Fail to Produce Evidence The court's ability to allow the defendant to record his statement after the closing of his evidence scope and procedure in each case where Action against the guilty party was compulsory and there was evidence. Closed because the case was clearly and explicitly misconstrued in OXVII, R 3, CPC, the court was not obliged to adjourn the case and adjourn the case in any way. He was asked to appear and to examine himself as a witness. At a later date it is evident that if the party was present in the court and wanted to appear as a witness, the court should not reject his request, but rather it would be appropriate that the party where the party was present should appeal to the court, O. XVII. When giving evidence, R 3, CPC and the closing of evidence on a date should ask the party to take the opportunity to appear as their witness and should also list such facts (order sheet) which I had the opportunity. The litigation was not taken advantage of, however, if such fact had not been filed by the court even though the party was present and had sought its examination, if the parties had not yet decided the case. But it should be examined for application in court. The matter was ultimately decided, especially in the appeal / review memorandum, a particular field should be set up, as the matter may be about the party's presence and seeking an examination, which is supported by the party's lawyer's affidavit. Should. For such an effect
