Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus ABDUL WAHEED SIDDIQUI

Article 8 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) After the conclusion of the definitive proof of controlling the rent of the property, the permission of the landlord and the appropriation of fixed rent was requested by the landlord that the value of the existing rent of the landed property. Not less than rent every month. At the time of granting the concession, the controller was not only bound by the claim clause but had to look at the whole claim and then give relief because it could arise as a matter of rent which was of the nature of a quasi-judicial proceeding and the delivery of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Was. Not strictly applicable, such acts could not be allowed to relieve the suffering.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary v. SULTAN AHMAD SHAMS 2014 SCMR 570
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.18 OF 2010 2014 SCMR 585
• PARVEZ MUSHARRAF v. NADEEM AHMED 2014 PLD 585
• ESSA ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT. LTD. v. PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANYLIMITED 2014 CLD 625
• Syed TAHIR HUSSAIN MEHMOODI v. Agha Syed LIAQAT ALI 2014 SCMR 637
• PROVINCE OF SINDH v. GHULAM HASSAN BUGHIO 2014 SCMR 643
• GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Excise and Taxation Department, Lahore v. METROPOLE CINEMA 2014 SCMR 649
• INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLD 650

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

online advocate from Patoki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes