Temporary Constitutional Order [1 of 2007], Preamble to the Office of Judges (Judges) Order, 2007, Preamble to the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 188 Sindh High Court Bar Association v. Federation of the Supreme Court to review the decision of the Supreme Court Request review Pakistan (PLD 2009 SC 789) Applicant's Judge Judge Scoopia is prejudiced that the Supreme Court bench headed by the then Chief Justice, who expressed his prejudice against the petitioner. What was This applicant filed a reference against the then Chief Justice and removed him from office and was detained, because the prejudice and enmity between the then Chief Justice and the applicant was clear and hence the former was heard and The matter was disqualified for rendering the judgment; that the then Chief Justice acted as a judge in his own cause, because such a decision was invalid at the trial which was for the applicant ex. The Chief Justice failed to provide evidence of any action which established his prejudice against the petitioner. In the absence of any factual claim about actual prejudice, it can be said that in fact filing a reference against the then Chief Justice, removing him from office illegally and keeping him under detention. No blame. Prejudice against the then Chief Justice was disclosed by the petitioner but there is no other way if the subjective notion of prejudice can be granted on the basis of the judge's recovery only because the applicant acted against the former Chief or There were unconstitutional actions. Justice, it will be very easy for anyone to stand trial
