Find a Lawyer

INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Articles 178, 209 (8) and Third Schedule Code of Conduct for judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, impartiality of Article 4 of a judge's close relative of the judge from the legality of a judge's re-hearing The trial judge had to decide for himself whether he belonged to another person or not, and he should not hear any special case in which such person was a party. That we could consider. Stay close to a judge / judge A judge is to act fairly, fairly and irrespective of whether he is hearing cases related to his own relatives, this is also the case with the High Court and High Court Judges Code of Conduct. 4 or connected to the office of judges. The Supreme Court (Article 178 of the Constitution) or the verses of the Quran did not prohibit the judges from hearing the cases unless there was a cause under Article 4 of the code of conduct of Judge Hussell. The F must decide whether or not he will sit on the bench. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. ABDUL WAHEED SIDDIQUI 2014 SCMR 630
• Syed TAHIR HUSSAIN MEHMOODI v. Agha Syed LIAQAT ALI 2014 SCMR 637
• PROVINCE OF SINDH v. GHULAM HASSAN BUGHIO 2014 SCMR 643
• GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Excise and Taxation Department, Lahore v. METROPOLE CINEMA 2014 SCMR 649
• Mst. NASEEM BEGUM v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 655
• INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLD 657
• LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, BOR PUNJAB v. Syed HAROON IFTIKHAR 2014 SCMR 659
• MUNAWAR HUSSAIN v. CHAIRMAN, APPEAL COMMITTEE (II) PUNJAB, PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL 2014 SCMR 664

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

famous lower court advocate from Khanqah Dogran lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes