Trial of evidence in section 2 (b (b) and Q 34 of the trial), mitigating circumstances In this case, the accused were convicted and co-accused by the trial court under Sections 302 (b) and 34, PPC. Was sentenced to death and sentenced to death as the High Court affirmed the death sentence in two cases, under which the trial court imposed the sentence. The FIR gives the impression that there was a hoax between the parties. Stall), however, no such independent verification evidence was presented. The complainant claimed that the dispute over the stall resulted in civil litigation. But there is no document. The trial record was brought before the court to show that the dispute over the stall is a hot issue between the parties and they have allergies. The court was fighting for it, therefore, was absolutely invalid, even if the motive established in the FIR was with the accused and the accomplices, but it was not of this magnitude and breadth to know. Individuals, however, were also marginalized, so the accused and the co-accused were not sentenced to death, because it was intended to be very weak. He had not been established, was presented as a fact certainly reducing conditions. Minor death sentences could not be punished but life imprisonment was more appropriate. The accused and co-accused were in the jail for about two to two years and spent about 16 years in the death cells of the accused and co-accused. Under Section 302 (b) of the sentence, the PPC was upheld
