SHAHZADA MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus SOOFI WALI MUHAMMAD
Sections 20 and 21 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) of the evacuation of property with the local Muslim were confirmed by the Custodian for evacuation of the property, initially requiring the subject shop to be non-Muslim. The claimant owned the. After being a Muslim, he exchanged his original shop with the article shop through a registered exchange deadline. After such exchange, the revenue officials changed the status of the real estate to the claimant and his stepmother / defendant. Has entered litigation in relation to the article shop. Subsequently, the two parties entered into an agreement whereby the plaintiff was designated as the exclusive owner and such suit, in contravention of the terms of the defendant's decree, An application for transfer of the article shop was filed under it. A scheme, which was accepted by the Deputy Settlement Commissioner, and the subject shop was transferred in the name of a subordinate defendant, which resulted in him entering the articles shop to amend the contract to sell it to the required buyer revenue authorities. The order of the Deputy Settlement Commissioner is set, in which the exempted buyer is sued for the specific performance of the contract of sale with the defendant. In addition, under Section 12 (2), the CPC filed a petition against the plaintiff alleging fraud and misrepresentation, since the date of the exchange, the plaintiff has been at the shop of the subject only The defendant never denied the fact that he was a party to the suit.
