Sections 52, 54, 55 (3) and 63 (a) of the Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O VI, R 15 require approval to be maintained on an oath to be associated with every election request and every schedule or election petition. Was the applicant's signature and certify in the manner described in OVI, R 15. In the present case, the applications filed before the Election Tribunal of CPC, O VI, R 15, the manner prescribed under CPC. Was not confirmed on oath. If the law requires a particular act to be done in a particular way, it was to be performed accordingly, otherwise it would be a non-compliance with the intention of the Legislature, as the applicants raised their objections to non-compliance with section 54 Had filed petitions to remove his election requests to remove. The Public Representation Act, 1976, however, barred applications because they were filed well beyond the 45-day period, as required by Section 52 (2) of the Election T of the Public Representation Act, 1976 Was provided under. The said applications should not be allowed because Rabanal was given timely restriction on which the appeal was allowed and the decision of the Election Tribunal was invalid.
