MUHAMMAD IQBAL HAIDER versus VTH RENT CONTROLLER/SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KARACHI CENTRAL
Sections 15 (2) (ii), 16 (1) and 17 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction to pay rent for premises rent as evidenced by the tenant's removal of temporary rent order non-compliance The respondent claimed that she was. The landlord, who purchased it through a registered sale-deed petitioner who was a tenant under the previous owner after changing the title to the premises, became the claimant / tenant in accordance with the tenancy agreement whose The defendant was required to pay the premises, failed to pay the rent, and on utility charges, the defendant filed a dismissal petition against the applicant. Instead of temporarily complying with the rental order, the rent and monthly rent recipient for the temporary rent order not only failed to submit the rent and future monthly rent arrears, but also filed a constitutional petition, which the High Court entertained. Provided, the applicant failed to appear. Respondent permanently challenged the constitutional request that the defendant in payment of rent could not knock the court door for relief as long as he paid the rent and arrears in accordance with the order approved by this competent court. Don't The law; that a person who did not respect the order of the court and did not comply with the order, could not get relief from the higher forum or the same petitioner for which he was temporarily hired. Failure to comply with the order, the constitutional petition filed by him was not admissible, which was liable to be dismissed, within the bounds of the trial court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
