MST. ANWAR BEGUM THROUGH ATTORNEY versus ZARAI TARQIATI BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MANAGER
Arts 199 and 25 Constitutional Applicants Citizens' Equitable Rating Applicant had borrowed from the bank and was regular in payment of dues and paid installments on time and the government had to provide relief due to interest as well as interest. The package was announced for those who were unwilling to pay the loan amount during the specified period, the applicant's installments, who regularly and periodically repaid the installments related to the period stated in the aid package. Did they even come under the jurisdiction? Entitled to enhanced benefits under the package and so on. The bank was discriminating against the package by refusing to extend it because it was a regular payer, and it deserved a higher relief / package than the one who had previously made a pledge. Had committed By refusing to repay the loan and relieve the applicant under the package, the bank has violated its right to equality of the citizen as provided under Article 25 of the Constitution, with all persons held in similar circumstances. Be treated and proper classification is mandatory. On the reasonable grounds of a particular situation, but equally, in any case, the spirit of Article 25 of the Constitution should not be construed as such an opportunity should be treated equally in the matter of equal rights and obligations, Under the uniform protection rule. Refusing the benefit of the relief package to the applicant would be like punishing the customers, who were regular in repayment of loan installments and applying the premium on default defaults in paying the loan amount.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
