Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LTD. THROUGH CORPORATE CENTRE BRANCH versus GALADARI CEMENT (GULF) LTD.

Defendant's claim in section 9 and 14 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 73 and O XXXIV suits, sued interlocutor for claiming bankruptcy by bank interceptor (Second Bank). That the claimant (was the borrower) received financial benefits from him and, despite his payment of dues, he committed the default. That the defendant had executed a letter of continuity in connection with his immovable property mortgage, under which the mortgagee already constituted security in favor of the interlocutor was recognized as security and the defendant In order to gain an interest it had to be a party to justify the action to protect its interest. The High Court observation that joining the party as a party in this proceeding will not be of any purpose in hearing the dispute in detail, so the application is granted \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• Mst. ANWAR BEGUM through Attorney v. ZARAI TARQIATI BANK OF PAKISTAN through Manager 2009 CLD 133
• Syed NASEEM AHMED v. Mst. HUMA NOOR 2009 PCrLJ 134
• LIAQ SHAH v. State 2009 YLR 135
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL HAIDER v. VTH RENT CONTROLLER/SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KARACHI CENTRAL 2009 YLR 136
• ABDUL KHALIQUE v. State 2009 MLD 138
• GENERAL MANAGER (H.R.), SOUTHERN TELECOMMUNICATION v. SECRETARY LABOUR, TRANSPORT, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2009 PLC(CS) 139
• Mst. AISHA KHATOON v. Mst. RAZIA 2009 PCrLJ 139
• PUB CORPORATION v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Managing Director 2009 PLD 139

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

online advocate from Chowk Azam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes