Find a Lawyer

S. MALIK TRADERS versus SAUDI PAK LEASING COMPANY LTD.

Section 22 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 and 29 Delay Appeal Council, in the present case, if the limitation period is computed from the date of signing and the period used to obtain a certified true copy of the decision and The order was also dropped for two days, yet the appeal was banned for one day; the fact is that the appeal did not apply to Section 5, the Limitation Act, 1908, which was preferred under special law. , The same was rejected by the High. The court

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. State 2009 YLR 167
• MUMTAZ TRADERS v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2009 CLD 169
• GHULAM MUJTABA v. State 2009 YLR 169
• SHADMAN COTTON MILLS LTD. through Director v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Chairman Central Board of Revenue (Revenue Division), Islamabad 2009 PLD 169
• TAIMUR USMAN KHAWAJA v. ALI MUHAMMAD SHAIKH 2009 YLR 171
• AL-AZIZ ROUTE TRANSPORT COMPANY v. ASKARI LEASING LIMITED 2009 CLD 172
• Mst. MEHJABEEN v. D.P.O. 2009 PCrLJ 173
• Syed NASIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. ZILA NAIB NAZIM, DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, SUKKUR 2009 MLD 174

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

law firms from Hassan Abdal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes