Find a Lawyer

MIAN SHIRAZ ARSHAD versus VIIITH CIVIL AND FAMILY JUDGE, KARACHI (SOUTH)

Sections 114 and A XLVII, R 1 review scope will only justify such errors in judgment / order, which were self-evident, floating on the surface, without much consideration. And the final outcome of this case review was its contents. An application cannot be filed as an alternative to the appeal and the court can only review its order when it will have a material impact, and may shadow the final outcome of the case and the application for review. Was only applicable to correct the error appearing in the order and not to correct the wrong decision which does not fall within the scope of the case review as given under the law, the request for review is not enforceable. Was

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• KHILJI BILAL AZIZ v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through E.D.O. 2009 YLR 1011
• Messrs YOUNG MEN\'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (YMCA) through President v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Social Welfare and Women Development Department Karachi 2009 CLD 1013
• Mst. SHAMAN v. State 2009 YLR 1013
• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. MIR MAQBOOL 2009 MLD 1015
• Sheikh AIJAZ AHMED v. D.-G. NAB 2009 PCrLJ 1019
• Malik MUHAMMAD JAWAID v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Local Government, Government of Sindh 2009 CLC 1022
• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. State 2009 YLR 1023
• MEHRAN DISTRIBUTORS through Proprietor v. UNITED BANK LTD. Through Engineering Division, Karachi 2009 YLR 1024

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Shankiari lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes