Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH AIJAZ AHMED versus D.-G. NAB

Section 497 National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Section 18 (g) bail, in conjunction with the co-accused, the accused's grants are alleged to have committed the alleged crime, which the accused admitted on bail. On the principle of consistency, the accused was also required to be placed in the same position as the accused was not subject to the co-accused and the matter relating to the non-performance of duties by the co-accused was a matter of neglect in the performance of duties. A decision will be made in the pending investigation. The case was completed, the trial was started, but no witnesses were investigated within a year and five months after the indictment, the purpose of the National Accountability Ordinance, limited to the early completion of the 1999 cases. And the law's objection was frustrated by the extraordinary delay in the case; Deputy Prosecutor General NAB's failure to justify the situation as to why the prosecution failed to reach a speedy conclusion. Because it was guaranteed under the law that the accused who imposed the doctrine of consistency was guaranteed attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Khair Pur lawyer