Arts 193, 194, 197, 255 (3) and 260 (1) Additional Judge of the High Court Office As the appointment of Additional Judge of the High Court, the appointment of a permanent judge of such court does not apply to any new post, but continues in that regard. ? The office of competency appointed by the Constitution for an Additional Judge of a High Court was the same as the appointment of a person appointed for a (permanent) judge of a court was the same as the appointment of an Additional Judge. The Judge Constitution did not provide a separate oath of office for any additional judge, and before entering the said office, an additional judge had to take the same oath which the constitution appointed as a permanent judge of the High Court. Was. The oath of office of an additional judge was determined by the Constitution itself, and in accordance with the provisions of Article 260 (1) of the Constitution, a High Judge in relation to a \ Judge included an \ Additional Judge. The appointment of a High Court Judge was made in several stages, and his appointment as Additional Judge marked the first and the earliest stage, and his final and formal appointment as a (Permanent) Judge was the closing phase of such appointment. ? The appointment of a judge was not a new appointment, but through such an appointment, his initial appointment as an Additional Judge was consolidated and integrated into the office of the Judge, after which the Additional Judge did nothing under his oath. Especially since the oath was an oath that he had already taken as an additional judge before entering the office of an additional judge that he had already entered the judge's office. And since then he has only been taken as a permanent judge. Strengthen your position in this office
