FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD versus AMNA AFRIDI
Rules for the Competitive Examination of the Sections 7 and 10 Federal Public Service Commission (CSS) The Federal Public Service Commission vacated the allocation of group error through the vacancy, which was increased by the High Court Scope Commission, which regretted the decision. Adds a blank space to a specific service group in the High Service. The fact of the error was acknowledged in its decision and the respondent got the right of preference over the other candidate, but on the mistaken assumption that the respondent had obtained his right, the same group also directed his adjustment by making an additional vacancy. Was Shall not be retained because there was no room for rules and policy to create an additional vacancy, when it was found that the candidate was entitled to be elected to the same group, the High Court had to comply with the rules and policies of the Government. Justification of interference was not stated until the decision of the quota / posts of the High Court up to the extent of the quota was not valid in the case of the candidate without any justification and in the eyes of the law, therefore an appeal was allowed in that case.
