Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IRFAN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Contempt of the Conduct (XLV of 1860), the guarantee of general intent of Sections 302 and 34, the grant of a further investigation to the disappearance of any fireworks injury, witnesses found only one firearm injury. , Which was attributed to the co-accused. Further inquiry into such matters is required on the question related to the crime of the accused. The accused is guaranteed under this.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• MUHAMMAD ASLAM AWAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 1289
• PROVINCE OF SINDH v. GHULAM HASSAN BUGHIO 2014 PLC(CS) 1320
• D.-G. A.N.F. RAWALPINDI v. MUNAWAR HUSSAIN MANJ 2014 SCMR 1334
• SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, FINANCE DEPARTMENT v. M. ISMAIL TAYER 2014 SCMR 1336
• Malik MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2014 SCMR 1349
• FAZAL UR REHMAN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Officer (Revenue) Bhakkar 2014 SCMR 1351
• FAQIR MUHAMMAD v. State 2014 SCMR 1353
• MUHAMMAD BOOTA v. State 2014 SCMR 1355

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

online advocate from Machi Goth lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes