Section 616161 An Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 by a Judicial Magistrate applying for an injunction after the FIR investigation was registered and to record the evidence of the prosecution's witness Subsequently submitted a report under section 173, CR. The PC and the Judicial Magistrate, who did not agree with the report, had requested the Investigation Officer to set aside the petitioner's order to furnish the challan against the applicant, the Judicial Magistrate's order affirming the prosecution. The presence of some witnesses is fully supported as stated. FIR, but the investigating officer denied his version because a large number of witnesses did not support the incident, which was sufficient to address the crime in the B-class diagnosis at which the investigating officer I tried to solve the crime. In the criminal administration of justice, the quality of the evidence should be considered by the court and, regardless of if, a witness whose evidence is substantially influenced by the trust and he or she is in charge of all the assumptions. Is free and convincing enough to convict the accused. In the present case, witnesses supported the incident, it cannot be said that the number of witnesses who were few, could not be considered in view of the high number of evidence which has since been made by the magistrate. Was not supported. The opinion was that the eyewitnesses supported the incident, unlike the witnesses who did not support the incident, further judicial inquiry was needed in the case, in these cases
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
