Find a Lawyer

SHAHAB SHAHZAD MIRZA versus NADEEM AHMED

Section 55 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Suit for Specific Performance of a Sale Contract When a dispute arises in relation to the interpretation of the sale process, the court will generally refer to the relevant documents as a rule Had to consider. In a movable property the time was of the essence of the contract, but in the case of real estate, the contract cannot be taken as the essence of the contract unless it was specifically settled under the contract since some time in the contract. Was to be settled, so it was to translate the terms of the contract, the conduct of the parties, the correspondence after the agreements as well as the action taken by the parties at the relevant time.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• PARAMOUNT SPINNING MILLS LTD. v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN APPRAISEMENT COLLECTORATE, LAHORE 2009 PTD 1575
• QURBAN ALI SHAIKH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH 2009 YLR 1575
• BASHIR AHMED v. State 2009 YLR 1577
• CANTONMENT BOARD MALIR through Executive Officers Karachi v. Dr. Syed SHAMIM UR REHMAN 2009 YLR 1582
• Malik DILNAWAZ v. State 2009 YLR 1604
• SARFARAZ HUSSAIN v. State 2009 YLR 1614
• Mrs. FARHAT JAMAL v. Mrs. AMBER KHAN 2009 YLR 1616
• IQBAL HUSSAIN AGHA v. HAZRAT NABI 2009 YLR 1624

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

law firms from Jehangira lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes