Find a Lawyer

CH. ZULFIQAR ALI versus STATE

Sections 16A, 18 (G) and 24 (B) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 199 Constitutional Appeal Bail, the accused's grant was in custody for almost four years and it seems that the reference against the accused could be finalized. Is. In one month's time, even though otherwise the non-compliance of the procedure provided under Section 16A of the National Accountability Ordinance could not have failed the proceedings, but continuing the reference against the accused for four years was understandable. Was. The court and it was clear that the delay was caused by the inability of the special prosecutor, the accused was admitted on bail, in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• SARFARAZ HUSSAIN v. State 2009 YLR 1614
• Mrs. FARHAT JAMAL v. Mrs. AMBER KHAN 2009 YLR 1616
• IQBAL HUSSAIN AGHA v. HAZRAT NABI 2009 YLR 1624
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. Mst. KOKAB BENAZIR FATIMA 2009 YLR 1627
• SHAMSUL ARFIN v. KBCA 2009 YLR 1648
• AKHTAR H. ASKARI v. CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU 2009 YLR 1653
• OCEANIC CONSTRUCTION CO., KARACHI v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE `C\', KARACHI 2009 PTD 1656
• GHULAM NABI SHAIKH v. PAKISTAN EMPLOYEES' COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY 2009 YLR 1666

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

lawer from fb area from Shujabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes