Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus MST. KOKAB BENAZIR FATIMA


Section 12 and S6 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 187 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), OVII, R 11 suit, for the specific performance of the contract of sale, permanently barring injunction and suit property Jointly as brothers and sisters. The plaintiff's plea was that the defendant had agreed to sell the property for himself and the defendant's lawyer, so the request for the jurisdiction of the co-defendant was that the plaintiff be entitled to give him evidence in favor of legitimate evidence. Did not have the authority to enforce such an agreement. Will the requirement for questioning be required, did the participating defendants authorize the defendant to execute such an agreement on his behalf, or would the recording of the claim be required, as well as the recording of the claim?

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Khurian wala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.