Definitions of Sections 2302 (b) and 4 324 Evidence The post-mortem report showed the number of injuries the medical officer denied the entire story of the prosecutor, as multiple injuries that damaged the exterior of the deceased's body. Yes, that can't be the reason. With a fire extinguisher under Section 161, the witness's CCP was recorded with considerable delay and was not accurately explained by the prosecution. Who also showed that the witnesses had not seen the incident and that the story was designed to convict the defendant that the witnesses did not agree with the deceased witnesses at or near the point of firing. But there was no consensus. The accused facts showed that the entire investigation had been completed before the FIR was registered, which was adjudicated in a number of cases by the Supreme Court in the cases which were present at the time of the incident and in fact involved. The commission of the crime and not only he but also incited those who committed the murder of the deceased, they were acquitted from the trial court, in these circumstances serious illegal action was taken while on record. The same evidence was not extended to the accused on the basis of last evidence. In the present case, the improvement was made, Section 161, CRPC, contradictions, defective investigation did not disclose the injury to the accused due to the delay in the recording of the statements and the benefit was to be given to the participating accused on the basis of the same evidence. Who did not state that the prosecution had failed to prove the charge against the accused. The number of houses surrounds the place
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
