MUHAMMAD UMAR versus YAR MUHAMMAD THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
Clause 8 and 20 refer to the dispute for arbitration, claiming the applicant's share of the applicant's share in the business, assets and property profits clause between the partners regarding the dispute. The respondents' request was that such request was not maintainable because the applicant had already retired from the partnership and, before mentioning the arbitration dispute, a new partnership has been established by acknowledging the new partner, three. There must be terms such as an arbitration agreement, the existence of a dispute and its other provisions. Do not be under the action. The Arbitration Act, 1940, provided that the parties had three such conditions. Under the agreements, the parties chose to hand over the dispute to arbitration, which they were obliged to honor and could not disregard the procedure provided under it, the High Court directed the defendants to enter into an arbitration agreement. And submit to the parties the name of the arbitrator of instruction within the stipulated time
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
