Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN ALIAS UMER versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 396/34, committed the murder during the robbery against the accused on bail, the names of some witnesses were not listed in the prosecution's witnesses Was identified after Parade 6. On the day of the arrest of the accused, which was not in accordance with the law, it was also stated that on the basis of the statement of the accused involved at this stage, the FIR was registered in the arrest and identification of the accused, Further investigation is needed. Bail was allowed in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• MEHRAB v. State 2009 YLR 302
• SULTAN KHALID MASUD KHATTAK v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division 2009 PLC(CS) 302
• BANK OF CREDIT AND COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL, S.A. through Special Attorney v. Mrs. SHAHIDA JAM SADIQ ALI 2009 PLD 303
• MUHAMMAD UMAR v. YAR MUHAMMAD through Legal Heirs 2009 CLD 305
• MUHAMMAD NASIR GHAZI v. G.M. PRINTO PACK (PVT.) LTD. 2009 CLD 307
• Malik MUHAMMAD RASHEED v. REGISTRAR (ITU) AND CHAIRMAN, NIRC 2009 PLC 308
• Mst. ANWAR BEGUM v. ZARAI TARQIATI BANK OF PAKISTAN through Manager 2009 YLR 308
• MADINA ELECTRIC MARKET through Shop-keepers Union v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through Nazim-e-Aala, Karachi 2009 PLD 309

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

advocate from Muridkay lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes