MST. ANWAR BEGUM versus ZARAI TARQIATI BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MANAGER
Arts 199 and 25 Constitutional petition Citizens' Equalities Classical applicant borrowed from the bank and was regular in payment of dues and paid timely installments and due to interest, the government announced a package for them. For individuals who regularly pay installments and installments according to the specific period in the aid package, the applicant's inmates provided relief for the applicants in the payment of the loan amount during the special period. Was entitled to the scope of the package and the benefits enlarged under it. The bank was discriminating against the package by refusing to extend it because it was a regular payer, and it deserved a higher relief / package than the one who had previously made a pledge. Had committed By refusing to repay the loan and relieve the applicant under the package, the bank has violated its right to equality of the citizen as provided under Article 25 of the Constitution, with all persons held in similar circumstances. Be treated and proper classification is mandatory. On the reasonable grounds of a particular situation, but in any case, the spirit of Article 25 of the Constitution should not be construed as being treated equally in terms of privileges and responsibilities under the rule of uniform protection of the law. Should. The applicant will have to avail the relief package to the consumers who are regular in paying the loan and installment installments. Applicant's case is filed by the Government High Court, respectively, by filing a premium on defaulter's error in payment of loan amount.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
