Find a Lawyer

BASAR KHAN versus STATE

Section 489F Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), on the report of the Investigating Officer presented by Section 571A & 169 Magistrate under Section 16969, in pursuance of the CR Review Sales Agreement issued by the accused Waldity Check Bay. Issued with faith, and there was no manslaughter in the case against the accused with the intent to deceive or deceive the complainant, on the contrary, it was the motivation of the accused whose first check 9,00,000 was broken, but after discovering that the property belongs to the complainant and not to the government, but not to him Was to allow the disclosure of the remaining two checks. The complainant has attempted to defraud the accused, which is in accordance with his rights. The document against the accused was based on documentary evidence to prevent the payment of the remaining checks from the case and even if the whole story of the work is believed to be straightforward, under section 489F, PPC against the accused. No case was set up. Even otherwise, there is a matter of civil dispute between the parties, they are free to pursue their own remedies in front of the Police Civil Court Episode Dictate, no doubt, the fate of this case. And they were not bound to court, but dragging an innocent person to court and facing the rigors of criminal cases And most would not be fair to leave, even though the crime was not proven trim police. And the magistrate was not prevented and prevented from the fair and equitable treatment of any law, but in every step of the matter, female advocates from Jatoi lawyer