Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHAB ABBASI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD

The selection of the office of Arts 62 (F) and 1993 President of Pakistan does not challenge the former Chief Justice of Pakistan's constitutional request from the former Additional District and Sessions Judge to submit nomination papers by the former Chief Justice of Pakistan. As was done in accordance with Article 62. f) The petitioner for the restoration of the constitution alleges that the former Chief Justice of Pakistan had dishonored his name from the list of candidates selected for the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge. And then, the then-acting Chief Justice appointed him to the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge, thus delaying his appointment by five years, his sanity was affected. Election Commission of Pakistan did not avail of treatment and why he brought the petition before the High Court without withdrawal as the applicant has been retired from the job after a long time and has never been angry with his authorized complaint before the competent forum. Had not happened A former chief justice will conclude without any substance that the plea is unfounded and was filed by a former president for defamation.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• SIKANDAR ABDUL KARIM v. Mst. QAMAR JAHAN 2009 CLC 42
• NAZIR AHMED DAYO v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Defence Islamabad 2009 PLD 42
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN KHAN v. N.I.B. BANK LIMITED 2009 CLD 42
• RUSTAM ALI v. State 2009 YLR 46
• ASHRAF ALI SHAIKH v. NATIONAL TRANSMISSION AND DISPATCH CO. through Chief Executive 2009 PLC 47
• MEHAR alias MEHAAR v. State 2009 PCrLJ 47
• M. NUJEEBULLAH QURESHI v. CITI BANK N.A. 2009 CLD 49
• GHULAM NABI v. State 2009 MLD 49

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Khuiratta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes