SIKANDAR ABDUL KARIM versus MST. QAMAR JAHAN
Appointment of AXL, R1 recipient, Rule 1 of O XL, CPC granted the court the authority to designate a recipient wherever it appears appropriate and convenient to do so. It states that the recipient's appointment has been waived at the discretion of the law. The court rules for appointing the recipient were that the discretion should be exercised a little and should be used for the interests of all parties, as well as for the protection of the property, which is personally illicit in litigation and in the possession of the property. There was a matter of possession. Before approving the order under the ROL of the CPC, the applicant had to file a lawsuit stating that he owns the property owned or has a vested interest that needs investigation and protection. Looking forward to the ultimate commitment to rights. Due to the anticipated loss, the parties receiving the suit may not be appointed, unless evidence of loss and injury was available for the loss and mismanagement of the property. In this regard, it was not sufficient for me to allege such a stringent order to deprive the neutral occupant of the property where there was no case for appointment of the recipient, the petitioner. An unauthorized application was moved by the court to exclude mere waste of court time, including costs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Kakur Town lawyer
